Flocculant Selection Chart: PAM vs PolyDADMAC vs Polyamine by Charge and Application
Organic flocculants build coagulated particles into flocs that settle, float or dewater. Choosing the right one is mostly about charge and molecular weight – after coagulation has done its job. This page pulls the three main organic flocculants (polyacrylamide, PolyDADMAC and polyamine) into one chart, with the charge logic that decides the choice.
1. The sequence: coagulant first, flocculant second
Coagulants (PAC, alum, ferric) destabilise particles and neutralise charge. Flocculants then bridge those particles into large, fast-settling flocs. Using a flocculant without proper coagulation gives poor, expensive results – the two work as a pair.
2. Two questions decide the flocculant
- Charge. Opposites attract: a cationic flocculant acts on negatively charged particles (most organic sludge, many waters); an anionic flocculant acts on positively charged particles (metal hydroxides, mineral tailings).
- Molecular weight and charge density. High molecular weight bridges flocs for settling/dewatering; high charge density neutralises and coagulates. Match to the job.
3. Side-by-side comparison
| Factor | PAM (polyacrylamide) | PolyDADMAC | Polyamine |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAS | 9003-05-8 (typical) | 26062-79-3 | 42751-79-1 |
| Charge type | Anionic, cationic or nonionic | Cationic (high charge) | Cationic |
| Molecular weight | Low to very high (by grade) | Low to medium | Low to medium |
| Charge vs pH | Depends on grade | Essentially pH-independent | pH-dependent |
| Main role | Bridging flocs; clarification and dewatering | Charge neutralisation + coagulation | Charge neutralisation + coagulation |
| Best for | Sludge dewatering, tailings, clarification, agriculture | Drinking water, papermaking, industrial clarification | Wastewater, sludge dewatering, oil-water separation |
4. PAM: pick the charge first
| PAM type | Charge | Typical use |
|---|---|---|
| Anionic | Negative | Mineral tailings, metal hydroxide sludge, high-turbidity inorganic solids; often high molecular weight |
| Cationic | Positive | Organic sludge dewatering (municipal/industrial), papermaking, water with negative colloids |
| Nonionic | Neutral | Specific slurries where charge is not the driver; some mineral and industrial uses |
See anionic vs cationic vs nonionic PAM for the full grade logic.
5. Selection chart by application
| Application | First choice | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Drinking water clarification | PolyDADMAC (or a cationic coagulant) | High charge, pH-independent; check the drinking-water approvals (NSF standards) |
| Municipal / industrial sludge dewatering | Cationic PAM | High molecular weight for strong, dry cake |
| Mineral tailings thickening | Anionic PAM (high MW) | See PAM in mining |
| Paper and board (retention / drainage) | PolyDADMAC or polyamine | Charge-driven; works with the wet-end chemistry (PolyDADMAC in papermaking) |
| Oil-water separation / produced water | Polyamine or cationic PAM | Charge neutralisation of oily emulsions (polyamine for oil-water separation) |
| High-colour / high-NOM water | Cationic polymer with a coagulant | Pair with PAC or ferric for best results |
| Agriculture / erosion control | Anionic PAM | Soil conditioning (PAM in agriculture) |
6. Quick decision rules
- Organic sludge / negative colloids? Cationic polymer (cationic PAM, polyamine or PolyDADMAC).
- Mineral / inorganic solids? Anionic PAM (high molecular weight).
- Need charge neutralisation more than bridging? High-charge polymer (PolyDADMAC, polyamine).
- Need fast settling / dry cake? High-molecular-weight PAM.
- Drinking water? PolyDADMAC with the right approvals; avoid unapproved grades.
- pH varies? PolyDADMAC’s charge is pH-independent; polyamine’s is not.
- Always jar-test or plant-trial the grade: two polymers with the same nominal charge can behave very differently.
7. Typical dosage
| Use | Typical dose (starting point) |
|---|---|
| Clarification | About 0.5 – 5 mg/L active polymer |
| Sludge dewatering | Set by kg polymer per tonne dry solids; test per sludge |
| Tailings thickening | About 10 – 50 g per tonne of solids |
Flocculant dose is always set by test – jar test for clarification, plant trial for dewatering.
8. Make-up and dosing
- Dilute first. PAM is made up to about 0.1-0.5% before dosing.
- Avoid shear. Over-mixing breaks flocs and wastes polymer.
- Dose point. Add after coagulation, with gentle mixing and enough contact time.
- Water quality. Use clean, low-hardness water for make-up.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between a coagulant and a flocculant?
Coagulants (PAC, alum, ferric) destabilise and neutralise particles; flocculants (PAM, PolyDADMAC, polyamine) bridge them into large flocs that settle or dewater.
Which flocculant for sludge dewatering?
Usually a cationic PAM, selected by charge density and molecular weight in a plant trial on your sludge.
Which flocculant for mineral tailings?
Usually an anionic, high-molecular-weight PAM. See the mining tailings guide.
Can PolyDADMAC be used for drinking water?
Yes, where the grade meets the relevant drinking-water approvals (for example NSF-listed). Check the certification for your market.
Why do two similar PAMs behave differently?
Charge type, charge density, molecular weight and the polymer’s structure all affect performance, so grades that look alike on paper can behave very differently on the same slurry – test them.
Related reading
- Water treatment chemicals overview: coagulants, flocculants, biocides and dechlorination
- Polyamine vs PAM vs PolyDADMAC: choosing the right organic flocculant
- Anionic vs cationic vs nonionic PAM: choosing the right grade
- Polyacrylamide in mining: tailings thickening and slurry dewatering
- Coagulant selection chart: PAC vs aluminium sulfate vs ferric sulphate vs ferrous sulphate
PolyBlueChem supplies polyacrylamide (anionic, cationic, nonionic), PolyDADMAC and polyamine flocculants for water, wastewater, mining and paper, with per-batch COA and SDS and FOB/CIF delivery. Contact us with your application for a quotation.