PAC vs Aluminium Sulfate vs Ferric Sulphate: Choosing a Coagulant

PAC vs Aluminium Sulfate vs Ferric Sulphate: Choosing a Coagulant

Coagulant choice drives the whole treatment train: dose, pH correction, sludge volume and the clarity you can achieve. The three workhorses are polyaluminium chloride (PAC), aluminium sulfate (alum) and ferric sulphate. This article compares them on the things that matter in practice – pH window, dose, alkalinity, sludge and application – so you can shortlist before you jar-test.

1. What each coagulant is

Coagulant CAS What it is
Polyaluminium chloride (PAC) 1327-41-9 Pre-hydrolysed aluminium polymer, [Al2(OH)nCl6-n]m; supplied as solid or liquid
Aluminium sulfate (alum) 10043-01-3 Classical aluminium salt; solid or liquid
Ferric sulphate 10028-22-5 Iron(III) coagulant; strong, acidic

2. Side-by-side comparison

Factor PAC Aluminium sulfate Ferric sulphate
Effective pH window Wide (roughly 5-9) Narrow (roughly 5.5-7.5) Wide (roughly 4-9)
Alkalinity consumed Low (pre-hydrolysed) High High
Speed of floc formation Fast, dense flocs Slower Fast
Works in cold water Good Poorer Good
Sludge volume Lower Higher Higher
Colour / iron carry-over Low Low Can add colour; residual iron
Cost per tonne Higher Lowest Moderate
Best for Drinking water, variable water, cold water, tight sludge budgets Simple, high-alkalinity water; low cost Phosphorus removal, high-colour or high-turbidity water

3. How to read the comparison

  • If your water is variable, cold, or low in alkalinity, PAC usually wins: it works across a wider pH, needs less pH correction and forms flocs faster.
  • If your water is stable and high in alkalinity, aluminium sulfate is often the most economical choice.
  • If you must remove phosphorus (for example municipal wastewater with a strict P limit), a ferric coagulant is usually the first choice.

4. Cost is not price per tonne

PAC costs more per tonne than alum, but it is often dosed lower and needs less pH correction, so the cost per treated cubic metre can be lower. Compare coagulants on:

  • Dose needed to reach your target turbidity or phosphate (jar test).
  • pH correction chemicals required (lime, caustic).
  • Sludge volume and the cost of handling it.
  • Chemical storage and dosing equipment.

5. You still have to jar-test

No table can replace a jar test on your water. Coagulant performance depends on turbidity, alkalinity, pH, temperature, NOM and the mixing regime. Test at least two doses of each shortlisted coagulant, compare settled turbidity, residual aluminium or iron, and sludge volume, then pilot the winner.

6. Supply

All three are available from stock grades: PAC (solid or liquid, by Al2O3 content and basicity), aluminium sulfate (solid or liquid) and ferric sulphate. Tell us the application (drinking water, wastewater, industrial), the water character and the delivery port for a quotation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is PAC better than aluminium sulfate?

Not always – it depends on the water. PAC works across a wider pH range, consumes less alkalinity and forms flocs faster, which helps for variable or cold water; alum is cheaper and fine for simple, high-alkalinity water.

When should I use ferric sulphate instead?

Mainly when phosphorus removal or high-colour/high-turbidity treatment is required; ferric coagulants are strong but can add colour and residual iron.

Which coagulant makes less sludge?

PAC typically produces less sludge than alum or ferric salts, because less is dosed and less alkalinity is consumed.

Related reading

PolyBlueChem supplies polyaluminium chloride (PAC), aluminium sulfate and ferric sulphate for water and wastewater treatment, in solid and liquid form, with per-batch COA and SDS. Contact us with your water character and volume for a quotation.

Scroll to Top